CHECK OF STRENGTH LIMIT STATE
Positive Moment Section
Total factored bending moment for Strength I is:
Mu = 1.25 (DC) + 1.5 (DW) + 1.75 (LL + IM) | (LRFD Tables 3.4.1-1&2) |
At midspan of center span:
Mu = 1.25(1619.6 + 2153.7 + 111.3 + 87.4) + 1.5(148.2) + 1.75(2485.2) = 9536.4 kN-m |
(LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.1.1-1) |
= | ||
= | ||
= | ||
= |
To compute c, assume rectangular section behavior, and check if c is equal to or less than ts. (LRFD C5.7.3.2.2).
where= | ||
= | ||
= | ||
= | ||
= | ||
= | ||
= | ||
= | ||
= |
We check if βx c < ts as per 2006 Interims Art5.7.3.2.3
= 0.85 x 111.0 = mm OK
Therefore, rectangular section behavior assumption is valid. Therefore, average stress in prestressing steel:
a = depth of the equivalent stress block
Nominal flexural resistance (LRFD Art. 5.7.3.2.3):
The above equation is a simplified form of Eq. 5.7.3.2.2-1 because no compression reinforcement or mild tension reinforcement are considered and the section behaves as a rectangular section.
Factored flexural resistance:
LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.2.1-1 |
where:
As per2006 Interims, the c/dt value will be used in computing the resistance factor
dt - the distance from the extreme compression fiber to the extreme tension steel element.
dt = h - ysteel = 190 + 10 + 1600 - 50 = 1750 mm
The report c/dt is = 110/1750 = 0.063 < 0.375
Therefore, the section is Tension Controlled and the resistance factor Φ= 1
Mr = 10899.1 kN-m > Mu = 9536.4 kN-m OK
Negative Moment Section
Design of the Section
Total ultimate bending moment for Strength I is:
Mu = 1.25(DC) + 1.5(DW) + 1.75(LL + IM) (LRFD Tables 3.4.1-1&2)
At the pier section:
Mu = -5986.1 kN-m
Note that at negative moment section, the compression face is the bottom flange of the beam, which is 975 mm wide and 135 mm thick. This section is being designed as non-prestressed reinforced concrete section, thus Φ = 0.9 for flexure. The bottom flange of the beam is in compression so concrete compressive strength of precast at final is used, f`c = 45 MPa
Assume the deck reinforcement is at mid height of the deck, so the effective depth, d, is:
d = 1600 + 10 + 0.5 (190) = 1705 mm
As = (ρbd) = (0.005858) (975) (1705) = 9738.19 mm2
= | ||
= | ||
= |
As per 2006 Interims, Art 6.7.3.2.3 we compare a = b1 x c = 108.03mm < hf = 135mm, therefore the rectangular section behavior assumption is valid.